Consumer Electronic Considerations; Digital Cameras

In todays world gadgets are everywhere and used by everyone, from school children to senior citizens - from mp3 players to blood glucose meters. There is little doubt in my mind that technology and everyday gadgets have made our lives better, albiet for the occasional vaporware and crippled consumer electronics. I try my best to follow the trends and future of such devices, mostly so that when it comes time for me to make a purchase (generally an expensive one), I don’t make the wrong decision.

People often ask me for my opinion on various electronics, from digital cameras to DVD players, and while I can talk for hours on end about the subject I try to leave them a basic set of rules or guidlines on what not to buy, or what features are generally meaningless, rather than an indepth understanding on how such devices actually work.

With the passing of Christmas I had countless converstations with family members and friends looking to make such purchases for themselves or as gifts. While the average geek should know the majority of these simple rules, I’ll take some time out to cover the basics should you be looking to purchase some new toys this year.

If you’re a gadget addict like myself, then you’ll want to keep up on the latest, greatest, and not so great products soon to be seen in your local electronics store. Luckily with the internet doing so is far from difficult, as opposed to researching a product just before you’ve decided to purchase it. There are countless consumer electronic magazines, blogs, and publications but finding one that will give you a honest opinion that is not swayed by marketing or close ties to specific vendors can be difficult.

First and foremost it’s probably a good idea to have a place to lookup some of those confusing terms that you might not be familiar with. For that I recommend searching for the term on Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia that is written collaboratively by it’s readers.

Digital Cameras

  • Digital zoom is not a selling point, in fact it is utterly useless. Digital zoom differs from optical zoom in that digital zoom is done through interpolation, the approximation of the surrounding pixels, where optical zoom is done with the lens and offers a true image at full resolution. In plain terms when you take a picture with digital zoom your camera is actually discarding pixels, resizing the image to full resolution, and using software to “fill in” the necessary pixels. You will get much better results by cropping your images and resizing them on your computer, with Photoshop for instance, than having your camera do it for you.

    It should be noted that digital zoom can, at times, result in decent images. However the more digital zoom you use and the further away the object you’re zooming in on, the worse the results. My advice is to never use digital zoom and if your camera allows you to disable it, do so.

    More information on digital zoom can be found at Wikipedia, and a detailed explaination at Cambridge in Colour.
  • Bundled software means nothing, and should not increase the price of your camera. It doesn’t matter what software they’ve bundled, unless maybe it’s the newest version of Photoshop (ya right!), or what it does. The bottom line is that there is plenty of free software out there that will do a far better job.

    A few examples are, Picasa from Google, Faststone Image Viewer, Image resizer and other Microsoft Windows XP powertoys, Paint.NET, and Gimpshop for Windows.

    My appologies for not covering free software alternatives for Mac, but I don’t have one nor access to one.
  • Proprietary lock-in features, also called vendor lock-in, are features that are only compatible with other products by the same vendor. With digital cameras this generally means some kind of software or connector to a printer by the same company that will make printing images “easier” or “automated”, but can extend itself to memory modules, for instance Sony cameras are only compatible with Sony Memory Sticks, lens mountings for SLR cameras, and even file formats.
  • File formats can differ from camera to camera, all cameras will take pictures in JPEG format, though some may support more. TIFF and RAW for instance, are higher quality images but will take up much more space on your memory card and aren’t necessary for normal usage. However where cameras can differ considerably is the format in which they record video files. Lots of new cameras are supporting MPEG-4 and Quicktime formats. While both formats produce high quality video at relatively the same cost in memory Quicktime locks you in to using their specific player, which I abhor (the player not the format).
  • Proprietary batteries vs. regular batteries. Batteries seem to be more of a personal preference than a selling point or lack there of. I personally prefer the proprietary batteries as they tend to last longer and cause less aggrivation than shelling out cash to buy packs of AA’s. However, one could make the argument that you can pick up regular batteries at just about every corner store so running out of batteries isn’t a huge problem, and you can always get some high quality rechargeables.
  • Eye finders are only useful on SLR cameras and most point and shoot cameras are not SLR. This means that what you see through the eye finder is only an approximation of what your camera is actually going to take a picture of, and if you’re using macro mode its probably nothing like what your picture will turn out to be. Use the LCD screen whenever possible.

So that’s basicly a run down of what I tell people to look out for when purchasing a new digital camera. Inevitably the next question is;
“What do you look for when you’re buying a camera?”

  • Price vs. Megapixels. Simply put you want the most for you money and just because a camera takes images at a higher resolution than another doesn’t make it better. If possible ask if you can take a similar picture with multiple cameras and see them up close on a computer screen. It’s not an unreasonable thing to ask for.
  • Lag time, or the ammount of time in which it takes the camera to turn on and be ready to take pictures. You never know when you’re going to see something you want a picture of, and chances are that opportunity isn’t going to last long, so the lag time should be a short as possible.
  • Burst mode is the ablity to take pictures in sequence, and is great for capturing movement or if you just want to take a bunch of images in a short period to be sure you don’t miss the perfect one. In this case you will be looking for the number of images that can be taken per second and at what resolution. Generally speaking the higher the resolution the slower and the less amount of time the burst can be sustained (due to limitations writing to the memory card).
  • Optical zoom, if you’re going to need to zoom in on things make sure you’re not going to be using a digital zoom.
  • Overall size; look and feel. Think about what you’re going to be using the camera for. If you’re like me and you want to be able to take pictures everywhere you’ll probably want something small, yet powerful, that you can keep in your pocket.
  • Moveable LCD screen, though it’s not a definitive selling point for me, if you like taking pictures of yourself you’ll probably want this feature.
  • Frames per second is the one of the most important things to look at when trying to understand the video abilities of your camera. If a camera can take video at 640×480 but at only 15 frames per second it’s generally useless for that feature. If video is important to you look for a camera that can shoot 60 frames per second, you’ll even be able to slow the video down to half speed without loosing quality.

Here is a small list of gadget and consumer electronic websites that I read on an almost daily basis to get the low-down on new products. Always remember to read the user comments on products that interest you, as some can be extremely insightful, but always take them with a grain of salt.

Gizmodo, Engadget, Living Room Photolog, Photography Blog, Tech Digest

And of course you’ll want to read about the latest-greatest photo software.

Download Squad, The Unofficial Photoshop Blog, Photoshop Support Blog

If you have any other recommendations or input, please make them in the comments for this entry. Enjoy and good luck shopping.

Share the Fury:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark

Categories: Non-Fishing

Tags: , ,

Thursday January 12th, 2006 @ 7:49 PM | Jonathon Marshall

No Responses to “Consumer Electronic Considerations; Digital Cameras”

Great post Jon. Lots of useful info.

Not sure if you remember me, but we traded some emails back in the middle of last year when i was looking for some advice on creating my own blog-type site.

Anyways, I happened to check out FF today and coincidentally, i’m looking to upgrade my digital camera. I’ve got a compact Sony 5.1mp that’s been real good to me, but I’ve been aching to get my first digital SLR. Photography is a hobby i’m as passionate about as fishing, and Im feeling too ‘confined’ with the limited amount of control that compacts generally offer. The only thing i’ll miss is the video capability - it’s been great to have on fishing trips.

I’m leaning towards the Rebel XT, but i’ll check out the links you provided before i make my final decision.

Dave on January 13th, 2006 @ 3:54 pm

Dave, I do remember our conversation and I hope I scared you far away from PHPnuke! Wordpress has been wonderful to us, despite a few XHTML/CSS rendering inconsistencies with FireFox and IE (my fault, or the browsers fault, not Wordpress).

I’ve been playing with quite a few different digital SLRs the past few months, and Im also in the market for one though its totally out of my price range at the moment (like the Canon EOS 5D).

I’ve heard lots of good things about the Rebels, but also a few bad things that have kept me away from them. Bare in mind that I believe the ones Im talking about are previous generations of the Rebel.

1. The lens adapter is not compatible with standard Canon lenses.
2. They are very prone to shorting, leaving you with dead camera. I personally know of two people that it has happened to, and believe me they were none to impressed.

If you’re dead set on Canon check out the EOS 10D and EOS 20D. You’ll be much happier in the long run. However, eventhough Im personally a huge Canon fan, you should really check out the Nikon D70. I’ve been using my friends D70 for a few months and I give it high recommendations for the price range your looking at.

You can find a good review of the Nikon D70 from dpreview.com.

Jonathon on January 13th, 2006 @ 6:53 pm

Jon, if you keep giving such good advice like this, you may never be able to get rid of me! ;)Anyways, after much deliberation (i spent hours and hours scouring through review after review after review), I am happy to say that I am a proud new owner of a Canon Digital Rebel XT.It was not an easy decision.In the end, I found that both the D70 and XT were considered to be very comparable in performance. I’d have to really think hard and long to remember a review that made a conclusion based on anything other than the reviewers personal preference in manufacturer. The impression that I got was that I would be plenty pleased with either camera.The Rebel was a couple hundred cheaper, felt better in my hands, and the retailer threw in a 1GB Lexar CF for free. I took the lens kit (18-55mm) as I didn’t have the spare $$ to upgrade just yet.I’m so excited I feel like a kid again!Thanks again for your advice…i may need to call on you again for help with my pblog!Fish on…

Dave on January 18th, 2006 @ 3:01 pm

Anytime Dave! Im glad to hear that I helped in your decision and I hope that your camera treats you well. Check out lenses by Sigma and Tamron, they’re cheaper than Canon and very good for the price. You’ll probably want to look into a UV and/or a Polarized lens filter. The plus side is that if you happen to drop your lens chances are the filter will crack/shatter instead of your lens.

Jonathon on January 19th, 2006 @ 1:55 am

Leave A Comment

Search

Categories

Contests

Culture

Entertainment

Features

Fishing

Food

Gear

Invasive Species

News

Non-Fishing

Watercraft

Freshwater Species

Saltwater Species

Places

The World

Tag Cloud

Archives

Feeds


Partner Feeds

Photos: Catch The Fury (Newest)

Photos: Catch The Fury (Popular)

Blog: Rockstar Lure Co

Recent Comments

Re: Ch-Ch-Cha-Changes

Gary is correct, the fishing up there is rarely not very good. This trip was from her first year up there and she probably caught an average of 40 fish a day or more. Believe it or not her favorite part was sitting in shallow water and casting her spoon trough the weeds for Pike. Her technique also got her the most walleye on the trip. I agree with ya Woody, nothing like spending the whole day on the water with no electronic toys to dull the day......well except for my portable fish finder. :)

Ken Reece (3 hours, 34 minutes ago)

well woody there are never any bad days while fishing in canada. probably my favorite place in the world to go fishing and get away from the rat race!

gary (7 hours, 35 minutes ago)

Re: Rocket Fishing Rod

My daughter wants me to get her a rocket fishing rod for Christmas, even though I did teach her the same way I learned with good ole rod and reel. I have seen more cons then pros with this product, but I don't wanna break her little heart and tell her she's better off with the rod she has now. Any tips to make the news breaking easier for both me and her? Thanks.

Chris (8 hours, 34 minutes ago)

Re: This Is Fly Issue 13

Aria Giovanni.... woo hoo!

chris (15 hours, 56 minutes ago)

Re: Christmas Carp

My. not YM...

chris (15 hours, 58 minutes ago)

Most Commented

Re: Lakemaid Beer Shirt Contest

I have a friend whose cottage is on Lake Chemong, never fished in it although I've heard all the stories. I was walking in it this weekend past, paddled it too, with Alexander directing.....check out the Curve Lake Powwow sometime!!!! I worked so hard this weekend, the shirt fell right offen me, so I need that shirt more than ANYONE else! Love your site!

Pete (2 months, 1 week ago)

Re: Bioline Contest!

[...] to Gary Switlick, the Bioline Contest [...]

Fishing Fury - A fishing blog about two guys with a serious passion for fishing, the great outdoors, crazy adventures, and heart-pounding entertainment. (1 month, 4 weeks ago)

Re: Stormy Kromer Hat Contest!

I'm not much for a pithy comment, but I thought I'd leave a note about how honored I be to wear Kromer on my upcoming annual pheasant hunting trip to South Dakota. I'm sure that my hunting buddies will joke about how silly I look while they wear their stylized broad brim hunting caps, but I'll be laughing on the inside as my head stays nice and warm. I'll be laughing al the more when the stiff South Dakota wind picks up and Kromer is staying put. Finally, with the fall bite on, I know my new Kromer will call the [...]

Jason Wilson (1 month, 2 weeks ago)

Re: Potential World Record Pike

Hi all, I am Dick van Hattem. The men who caught this wonderfull pike in the Netherlands. The pike was actualy 120 cm long, weight exactly 16.5 kilo's and was caught on a death perch on 10 meter deep water on 27 december 2000. But now.... the photo was shopped for fun. I had a reading for a fishingclub and this was the last picture of the reading I had for 100 quest. Name of the picture.... I have a dream..... Everybode was laughing. Really funny, never claimed the world record. Because it is not by far. http://www.metersnoeken.nl/inde x.php?option=com_content&task=s ection&id=13&Itemid=48 here you can find [...]

Dick (2 months ago)

Re: Get Girls Fishing! A How-To Guide for Men

[...] at Fishing Fury have always been advocates of getting girls into fishing. For some strange reason, fishing has been seen as a mans sport, but anyone and everyone can (and [...]

Fishing Fury - A fishing blog about two guys with a serious passion for fishing, the great outdoors, crazy adventures, and heart-pounding entertainment. (2 months, 4 weeks ago)