Switzerland Bans Catch-And-Release

At first I was sure they were banning the romantic comedy starring Jennifer Garner and the one and only Kevin Smith, but this was not the case – although they should probably ban that too. As far as I know Switzerland is the only country to do something like this. As a sport fisherman, who releases 99% of the fish I catch, it’s hard to understand why such a ban makes sense to anyone. First off sport fishing generates more income then baseball, hockey and basketball combined. More importantly, a ban on catch-and-release will ultimately mean less fish to be caught in the future. I don’t know anything about the fishing regulations in Switzerland (maybe someone could clarify them for us) but in Canada we have specific rules on what size fish can be kept. In a catch and kill situation the fish that should be returned to the water to breed would all be killed.

Read the article below and let us know what you think of a ban on catch-and-release.

via The Chattanoogan

    From EFTTA (European Fishing Tackle Trade Association)

    Catch and Release fishing will be banned in Switzerland from next year, it was revealed this week.

    And anglers in the country will have to demonstrate their expertise by taking a course on humane methods of catching fish, under new legislation outlined by the Bundesrat – the Swiss Federal Parliament.

    The new legislation states that fish caught should be killed immediately following their capture, with a sharp blow to the head from a blunt instrument. Under the new regulations, the use of livebait and barbed hooks is also prohibited except in certain situations.

    The laws come into effect in 2009 but while the Swiss government does not mention Catch and Release specifically, it does say that “it is not permitted to go fishing with the ‘intention’ to release the fish.”

    EFTTA lobbyist Jan Kappel has been in contact with Martin Peter, Vice President of the Swiss Angling Federation, to see whether a joint approach to the Swiss government could persuade them to amend the legislation – which forms part of a much wider animal welfare programme.

    The law on the protection of animals was passed by the Swiss parliament in 2005 and officials have spent three years refining the details, taking into account the comments of interested parties.

    Said Jan: “Catch and Release is one of the most difficult issues we have to deal with, and one of the most important in my opinion.

    “The new Swiss law doesn’t make use of the term ‘Catch and Release’, which is the same as in Germany – but I don’t see how governments can enforce legislation which makes ‘intent’ illegal.

    “And demanding that people kill the fish they catch gives no thought to the conservation benefits from releasing them.”

    Angling Codes of Conduct with regards to proper handling and releases can be found for practically any fish species caught by anglers in Switzerland and the rest of the world. The new Swiss law makes it obligatory for anglers to take lessons before being granted a fishing license. So there is absolutely no need for an outright ban on the release of fish in Switzerland.”

    It’s believed that the legislation could affect as many as 275,000 anglers in Switzerland, who generate around 30 million Euros in annual tackle sales.

    EFTTA acting president, Pierangelo Zanetta, said: “EFTTA does not believe that forcing anglers to kill their catches is either good for nature or for recreational sport fishing – which makes a significant financial contribution to the EU economy.

    “Making the killing of fish obligatory will simply reduce fish population and, at the same time, run the risk of having a negative impact on sport fishing.

    “Anglers and the sport of angling invest time and money to improve water quality and create larger and healthier fish populations. We believe is it far better for the fish if the fisherman decides, according to the situation, whether to keep and eat the fish or to release it.”

8 Comments on “Switzerland Bans Catch-And-Release...”

SPONSOR
  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Here in Japan in some prefectures there is a catch-and-kill law for largemouth bass and bluegill. Both are non-native invasive species that have had catastrophic impact on local wildlife and fisheries industry. Some of the more popular fishing spots have a place (basically a covered fishtank) you can leave any bass you catch, which are then collected, killed and disposed of by rangers or the local authorities later. Unfortunately, there are still many irresponsible sport anglers, especially younger people, who ignore the local law.
    However in this case I would disagree with the Swiss release ban, although I wholeheartedly agree with the concept that lessons should be required for a sport fishing license. One can see too many anglers these days who don’t handle fish correctly, making the whole idea of catch-and-release meaningless as their catch will probably die afterwards due to mistreatment.

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Good point Adam. I’ve seen people release fish in pretty poor shape. But that bring us to another sensative topic – what if you have a fish that clearly wont live, but it isnt the size you are allowed to keep? By our laws here, you have to let it go, which to me is a waste.

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Yes I agree judging keep or release just by size alone, that’s clearly a paradox. I think personally anglers have a responsibility to use the largest possible hooks and lures to reduce the chances of catching juveniles (this is probably harder to do when you are fishing for voracious predators like sea bass that will try to swallow anything it thinks edible, even as very young fish). There are a number of such systems in place here; in one managed river in Izu I fished in last year, for amago (a type of Japanese trout), you could use any gear you wanted provided you used their hooks, which were thin but very large (and barbless).

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Another thing im thinking is that maybe they are trying to limit the amount of people fishing …. and leaving it to the more serious anglers who will only go to catch and eat a fish … thus killing off the casual angler and introducing a more true to hunt game angler ….

    dont like the idea though .. i think the negatives might outweight the positives …

    and although invasive species are a problem across the world … mark my words … you will never change or reverse whats been done …. those fish will ALWAYS be there once introduced …..

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    If we as anglers don’t pay more attention to our laws and start backing the organizations that lobby our gov’t , I can see a similar law being passed in Canada in my sons generation.

    Clive- Releasing a fish that is clearly not going to survive is not a waste. It still feeds other species in the eco-system.

    We need to be responsible anglers both on the waters and in our gov’ts. These kinds of laws aren’t as far off as we like to think.

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Fair enough Jonny, but correct me if I’m wrong, isn’t there also a law in Ontario against throwing dead fish back in the water?

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    Jeez bro imagine this me quoting regs.

    It is ILLEGAL to Abandon Fish or permit the flesh to spoil. That could be interpreted many ways. However it also states in the regs: If you catch a fish of a restricted size range you must release it immediately. I don’t think that releasing a fish in poor condition could be classified as permiting the flesh to spoil or abandoning the fish.

  • avatar
    3 years, 9 months ago #

    You’ve come a long way! HAH!

Leave A Comment




SPONSOR